Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflectionHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 56/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Beam 1.0 501B A23B | 50/100 | 88/100 | 61/100 | 92/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$1.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
5.5M
351K
Completed sessions
150,678,590
6,200,186
Token share
49.4%
1.41%
Tokens
661T+4,858%
19T+100%
SEP 13NOV 7
SEP 13NOV 7
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
72.8%522K user-weeks
72%3.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Jamba MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Jamba Mini